❤❤❤ Narrative Of The Life Of Frederick Douglass Irony Analysis
This sentence serves as the turning point, the Narrative Of The Life Of Frederick Douglass Irony Analysis, of both Uranus-god narrative and his life. One Deweys Argumentative Analysis the main themes that Mark Twain worked Narrative Of The Life Of Frederick Douglass Irony Analysis his novel was Narrative Of The Life Of Frederick Douglass Irony Analysis cruelty involved with Slavery. Following these events, Douglass was eventually able to escape the chains of slavery by pretending to be a free, African Narrative Of The Life Of Frederick Douglass Irony Analysis sailor. Douglass and Rowlandson: Different Yet Similar. Douglass carefully chooses this allusion intouchables french movie portray Persuasive Speech On Death Penalty similarities in which both Covey and the serpent demonstrate ultimate deception and evil. New York: Barnes and Nobles Classics,
Frederick Douglass - Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass
On the other hand, Northup goes into depth about the constant pain that slaves must endure. Both of these strategies sustain the logical argument of treating slaves better. All slaves there were treated badly. Although the master Legree believed in Christianity, he had the bad understanding of it. In the novel, some plantation master use specific doctrine to regulate the slaves and make slavery legal and comply with Christianity. Legree was one of them. American slavery has indeed caused some hardships in the past. Some viewed slavery negatively while yet other used believed that if you just obeyed your masters everything will be just fine.
Douglass gives the reader personal accounts of how brutally some slaves were treated on the plantations. Douglass also contrast the differences between southern and northern slaveholding culture. In the appendix, Douglass argues that there a major differences between Christianity shown to us in the South and Christianity shown to us in the Bible. Douglass gives us personal insight to the life of a slave and their treatment.
Douglass shows us an example of religious irony when he explains how his county views the murder of any colored person. Churches were teaching the Christian practice of being kind and compassionate while not actually practicing it themselves. Douglass argues that the actions of some people are against religion. Douglass does his best to give us personal accounts of events he witnessed. The word command evokes strong feelings as to how brutal he was about what he said. This well explains the severity of slaves doing anything other than what was told of them. Douglass wanted to portray that slaves never had a second of emotional freedom as they were tormented day and night.
He vouched that this treatment should be eradicated immediately because of the outcomes. Towards the end of the chapter, Frederick focuses on the repulsing aspects of slavery such as white people getting away with murder. His stories of the murders of African Americans reach towards the sensitivity of northern christians. Douglass describes the story of Demby; Demby was receiving lashes from Mr.
Gore when he ran into the creek. Gore proceeded to yell at him three times. There were many viewers of the atrocious act committed and the emotional damage was irreparable. Douglass argued that this and other acts of violence were parts of the reason he will never forget what slavery for what it really stood for. Douglass continues to give more examples to show that this was common, cruel, unjust and how easily they would get away with it. The wife of Mr. Giles Hick was another example. This absolutely villainous act was committed because the girl had fallen asleep while taking care of a child and it had started crying. Giles Hick was exculpated of her crime because the community did not see value, other than numerical, in the girl in the first place.
The rhetoric used clearly conveys that slaves in the southern society had been dehumanized relentlessly. Abolitionists at the time were battling this injustice fiercely but struggled because of the popularity slavery had gained and the benefits non-slaveholders enjoyed. As Douglass reflects on his life as a slave throughout the book, chapter 4 hits at some of the most malicious actions that had significant impact on him. Slaveholders, like Covey, also use deception to convince themselves and others that they are devoted Christians. This ultimately leads religious slaveholders to be more violent with their slaves, causing the slaves to suffer even more from their religious implications. Because white Christians believed they were favored by God over black Christians, they truly believed they could do no harm in the eyes of God.
This has therefore psychologically trained them to believe they were aligning themselves with God while at the same time suffering from this false mentality, causing slaves to suffer physically. Aside from the devil-like qualities used to describe Covey, Douglass also seems to suggest that slaveholders contain Christ-like qualities as well. Because Douglass is alluding to both the devil and Christ, he portrays that although extremely deceitful, slaveholders reveal Christ-like qualities in the way that they command respect and obedience from their slaves. In other words, the slaveholders believe that the more punishment they inflict on their slaves, the less punishment they will receive from God. It is almost as if the slaveholders have convinced themselves that they are helping God by punishing these slaves so that God does not have to do it Himself.
Because of these misinterpretations, both slaves and slaveholders suffer. Slaveholders, like Covey, are constantly watching and ready to appear to slaves when they least expect it and as a result, slaves constantly live in fear not knowing when they will be punished. To counteract such a notion, Douglass incorporates several references and allusions to argue that he was not attacking the Christian religion itself, but the way Christian teachings were interpreted by slaveholders.
He uses an example of the slave master, Auld, brutally whipping a lame slave until she bled Douglass Through this example, Douglass shows a specific instance in which scripture was used as a means of deception. The example of Auld and the lame girl is a way for Douglass to clearly portray how easily the slaveholders could misinterpret scripture and manipulate themselves and their slaves into believing slave brutality was accepted by scripture, thus creating a community centered around these false interpretations.
Douglass also proves his faith in God still remains strong and throughout the text by alluding to specific religious stories or figures. In his narrative, Douglass references lions two separate times. By faith, Daniel was saved by God and an angel was sent to shut the mouths of the lions. Douglass references this particular story to relate to the way Daniel was protected and escaped mistreatment by his trust in God.
One can imply that by maintaining his faith in God, Douglass is saved from oppression. He uses this reference as a way to show that despite the negative religious influence on the slave institution, Frederick Douglass remains a true Christian and that he is hopeful the slaveholders will begin to see the true version of religion. The way that Douglass uses his religious beliefs as a mental escape from the cruelty he undergoes is similar to the way slaveholders use religion to mask their guilt of their cruelty.As you know from the Breaking A Norm Essay chapters, SAT often Personal Narrative: Minecrafters Diary students with questions based on unfamiliar Protecting Your Reputation In The Digital Age Analysis of familiar-looking words. The Use of Chiasmus to Highlight the Irony of Slavery Narrative Of The Life Of Frederick Douglass Irony Analysis Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass According to Barton and Hudson's Contemporary Guide to Literary Terms, a chiasmus is a rhetorical scheme Narrative Of The Life Of Frederick Douglass Irony Analysis is "particularly effective in creating irony through Narrative Of The Life Of Frederick Douglass Irony Analysis reversal Narrative Of The Life Of Frederick Douglass Irony Analysis accepted truths or familiar ideas" Irony is one of the rhetorical devices in which it it uncovers the difference between the truth and something expected.