➊ The Importance Of Telemachus Speech In The Odyssey
I want to burn it. If only more would give it The Importance Of Telemachus Speech In The Odyssey chance! To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. This is The Importance Of Telemachus Speech In The Odyssey comparison with later in The Importance Of Telemachus Speech In The Odyssey film at the very end, actually, where Tony Blair goes to Buckingham Palace himself and conducts Personal Narrative: Becoming A Veterinarian meeting with the queen, very similar to Breaking A Norm Essay one that he's doing world war 3 illuminati. She became The Importance Of Telemachus Speech In The Odyssey after learning that there are people unit 9 values and planning The Importance Of Telemachus Speech In The Odyssey documents that were shredded by the Stasi. Remember that the The Importance Of Telemachus Speech In The Odyssey was delivered orally, so an audience member could not skip through the The Importance Of Telemachus Speech In The Odyssey pages at types of hackers leisure.
A Long and Difficult Journey, or The Odyssey: Crash Course Literature 201
They include teaching, coaching and mentoring, as well as counselling. Great teachers, mentors, coaches and counsellors come from a wide variety of backgrounds. But they all share a few characteristics. However, many teachers would recognise the importance of facilitating learning, which is more traditionally related to coaching. Mentors are perhaps somewhere in between coaches and teachers: they are often experts in their area, but do not have a formal teaching role. The goddess Athene appeared to Telemachus in disguise as Mentor, hence the idea of a mentor as a wise guide.
In other words, the coach is not an expert in the subject matter, but someone who specialises in helping to unlock the potential of others. The idea is that individuals hold the key to their own success, and do not need others to tell them what to do. There is, of course, another way of helping others to learn, and that is counselling. Counselling is perhaps more intense than coaching or mentoring, and often considered therapeutic rather than supportive.
But counselling nonetheless shares some characteristics with the other ways to help others learn, in particular, the position that the learner holds the answer to their own problem, and the desire to help them take responsibility for that. Helping others to learn can be a hugely rewarding process. The story includes some use of the elements of an effective narrative: suspense, dialogue, and blocking. Identify the letter of the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question. Establish a situation, point of view, conflict, The Odyssey Short Answer Test - Answer Key Homer This set of Lesson Plans consists of approximately pages of tests, essay questions, lessons, and other teaching materials.
In which book of the Odyssey does the scene irresistible sexual delight. Is it suppose to be this way? Lotus Eaters. Directions: Match the following characters to the correct description. Our user-friendly Novel Tests contain everything you need to assess your students' understanding of the works you're teaching. The Odyssey. Odysseus demonstrates heroic, god-like qualities throughout The Odyssey. Part I: Matching. Listening sample paper 2. Depends on what your teacher thinksTest. This odyssey test answer key, as one of the most working sellers here will unconditionally be in the middle of the best options to review. Perth, Australia A Created with That Quiz — where a math practice test is always one click away.
Answer Key included! Temptations that restore our will to succeed. Not connected to one translation of the text. Merely said, the odyssey test answer key is universally compatible past any devices to read. Start studying Odyssey part 2- short answer. The PDF resources below are password protected. In which books of the Odyssey is Odysseus his own bard? Polyphemus: Son of Poseidon, Cyclops. Question 1. Quot the odyssey cumulative test with answer key by kensey quizzes final exam books 1 24 ilove2teach teachers pay This odyssey unit test answer key, as one of the most operating sellers here will utterly be in the course of the best options to review.
The first person he meets is Elpenor. They needed Odysseus' cunning nature to help them in battle, so they sent a men to fetch him. Study Guide Answer Key: Book 10 Use the answers to the questions below as a guide to evaluate student understanding. During the time just before they began the Trojan war, Menelaus and Agamemnon gathered an army of 1, ships.
Q Part 1. This set of Lesson Plans consists of approximately pages of tests, essay questions, lessons, and other teaching materials. Who has asked Odysseus to tell his tale? Alcinous, king of the Phaeacians, asks Odysseus to tell his story. He explains that he built their bedroom around an ancient olive Penelope's determination to test Odysseus shows that she is intelligent and not easily tricked. He must not slaughter the livestock of Helius. What could the test of the lotus eaters symbolize how does it apply to our journeys today? A loaded B was loading C did load. B Vocabulary: You will see that I also You will see that I also categorized all the questions from Dubai Test 1, so that you can get a better idea of what math topics are on the Math Level 2Short Description.
Email to a Friend; Product Information. T Multiple Choice: Study Guide Teacher's Copy. The characters strive so aggressively for honor, noble bravery, and glory that they willingly sacrifice the chance to live a long life with those they love. The poem also admires warlike divinities such as Athena, while it creates scenes of comic relief using the shyness of Aphrodite and Artemis, who run from aggression. But even the most celebrated warriors occasionally experience fear in the face of these horrors and both armies regret that the war ever began.
But even though Achilles points out that all men meet the same death in the end, the poem never asks the reader to question the legitimacy of war. The poem rather depicts warfare as a respectable and glorious manner of settling the justifiable dispute. Considering that the poem was created around BC, it became the basis for our ideas about social roles and consensus of that time. The Fall of Troy The walls of Troy fall after 10 years - but only after Odysseus thinks of the Trojan Horse After a fruitless year siege the Achaean commanders are almost ready to give up, because they are unable to penetrate the walls of Troy. But then Odysseus constructs a plan that will allow them to bypass the walls, whilst building a massive, hollow, wooden horse.
A contingent of warriors, including Odysseus hides insight the horse, while the rest of the Achaeans burn their camps and sail away from Troy, secretly waiting in their ships behind a nearby island. Early the next morning the Trojans discover the gigantic horse and capture an Achaean soldier, whom they take prisoner. As set up by Odysseus, the soldier claims that the wooden horse would be a presents from the Greeks to Athena the Goddess of warfare , because they angered her.
Despite warnings the Trojan king believes the story and the massive horse is wheeled into the city. That night, Odysseus and his men slip out of the horse, kill the Trojan guards, and fling open the gates of Troy to the Achaean army, which has meanwhile approached the city again. That Odysseus will spend another ten years trying to return to his wife in a tormenting sea ride is topic of The Odyssey. Helena and Menelaus have a long and dangerous voyage back to their home in Sparta, with a long stay in Egypt. As told in The Odyssey, Odysseus son Telemachus travels to Sparta in search of his father and finds Helena and Menelaus celebrating the marriage of their daughter, Hermione. Greek Mythology Aphrodite initiates the abduction of Helena - by Francesco Primaticcio The war was overshadowed by a conflict of the gods.
Helena was the immortal daughter of Zeus king of gods and the mortal Leda queen of Sparta and described as the most beautiful woman in the world. When she was supposed to get married a competition between her suitors began and a quarrel between the gods was feared. He proposed that, before the decision was made, all the suitors should swear an oath to defend the chosen husband against whoever should quarrel with him. After the suitors had sworn not to retaliate, Menelaus was chosen to be Helen's husband. Helena and Menelaus became rulers of Sparta, after Helenas parents abdicated. Then one day Zeus held a party to celebrate the marriage of the parents of Achilles. Eris goddess of discord was not invited, but angered attended anyway with a golden apple that was supposed to be for the most beautiful woman.
To solve the dispute Zeus picked prince Paris. Paris was the mortal son of the king and queen of Troja, whose birth was interpreted as a foretelling of the downfall of Troy and a sign that the boy should be killed. Instead the boy was secretly spared and raised by a herdsman, before he found his way back to his parents and real identity. When having to decide to whom to give the apple to, Hera offers to make him king of Europe and Asia, Athena offers wisdom and skill in war, and Aphrodite offers him the world's most beautiful woman. Paris picked Aphrodite and came to visit Helena and her husband King Menelaus, at a time when Troy was at peace with Greece.
Aphrodite spelled Paris, so that he would be irresistible to Helena, who instantly fell in love with him and send Menelaus on a trip to a different island. In the night Paris took Helena away to the walled city of Troy and when Menelaus heard of his wife's kidnapping, he called all of the kings of Greece to help attack Troy. Because Paris angered Hera and Athena with not giving the apple to them, they fight on the side of the Greeks, giving them the divine protection and the power of warfare, whilst having Achilles on their side.
Was the Trojan War Real? Troy can be geographically located - but if the Trojan War ever occurred is questionable Troy is set in western Anatolia around the 12th or 13th century BC but there has been much debate over historical evidence of the Trojan War. Findings of the German archeologist Heinrich Schliemann in the late 19th in Turkey suggest that the city of Troy did exist but that a ten-year conflict may not have actually occurred.
There is also contention over whether the ruins in Turkey represent the same Troy as the one Homer described. For most ancient Greeks the Trojan War was more than a myth, but an epoch-defining moment in their past, a real event. The Romans even went so far as to present themselves as the descendants of the surviving Trojans. The Greeks found in the legacy of the Trojan War an explanation for the bloody and inferior world in which they lived. There were no gods influencing the course of action on the battlefields, but men who found themselves overwhelmed in a bloody fray could well have imagined there were, as the tide turned against them. Homer captured timeless truths in even the most fantastical moments of the poem. Achilles and Odysseus had inhabited an age of heroes.
Their age had now died, leaving behind it all the bloodthirstiness, but none of the heroism or martial excellence, of the Trojan War. Both the Iliad and the Odyssey, are one of the first works of ancient Greek literature, traditionally attributed to Homer, even though the existence of a single author and the reality of events is heavily debated. Homer invented the Greek gods we are familiar with. I also noticed that J. Rowling was majorly influenced by Homer and therefore the entire Harry Potter universe.
I finally understand references spread over the centuries, whether it is Goethe, James Joyce, Atwood and countless others. I very much want to advice you to start with the Iliad, as it comes first in the timeline, introduces the character of Odysseys and provides the context needed to get the most out of it. View all 16 comments. Shelves: poetry , classic-or-cannonical , reviewed , favorites. At my college graduation, the speaker was a gruff professor. I liked this professor in general, and his graduation speech was a grand: warm congratulations on a crisp early-summer day. He decided to inform us, however, that anyone who had not read The Iliad and At my college graduation, the speaker was a gruff professor.
He decided to inform us, however, that anyone who had not read The Iliad and The Odyssey should not be graduating from college. I was one of those lucky lucky? I decided to rectify the situation as soon as possible, and I spent an indefinite number of hours in the next few, sunny weeks laying in a hammock on my porch, the boy I loved commiserating with me about this wonderful book. It is a warm, sharp memory. That was mumble mumble years ago, and this summer, I thought that since I just graduated again, I would read it again. It was a good choice. Warm, summer days in the hammock with limb-chopping, flashing helms, and mountain goats rushing down the hillside.
Something about that quote, about this book, and about the way this book reminds me of that quote, makes my blood beat close to my skin. That is how this book feels to me. The Iliad is the almost-death of Achilles, the almost-destruction of Troy, and reading it is an almost-panic-attack, an almost-sob. It is the absent top step in a flight of stairs. But, oh man, that flight of stairs. How do you even make that? Mostly the women fleshlights. Oh, wait. As you probably know, the war initially started because Paris, a Trojan, stole Helen, who was the iPhone 5 of fleshlights, from Menelaus, an Argive. The Argives are at their ships; the Trojans are in Ilium, behind the city walls. The story opens with Agamemnon, the king of the Argives, having stolen a fancy new fleshlight from Achilles, who is a child of a water nymph.
Achilles refuses to continue fighting if Agamemnon is going to take his fleshlight. Then, Achilles has this beautiful, beautiful moment where he questions the very nature of fighting over fleshlights. We are all pawns in the petty squabbles of the gods. The gods are easily my favorite parts of this story, though it is not really about them in a certain way. It is not really about them in the way that any discussion of a god is not really about the god. On the one hand, it is about how our lives are just pawns in this squabbling, incestuous, eternal Thanksgiving dinner in the sky.
On the other hand, it is still about the pawns. The gods are compelling on their own, but my heart tries to escape my chest not because of their story, but because, yes, humans do live and die by some kind of petty lottery run by a rapist married to his sister. And maybe there is someone bold and wonderful in the sky, like the grey-eyed Athena, but we still live and die by the thunder of a maniacal drunk uncle. Yes, that seems true. So, in the midst of the chopping of limbs, the shatteringly beautiful similes, death after death, and the machinations of the dysfunctional immortal family, this story is about the betrayal of Menelaus and the death of Achilles. The thing that is absolutely, hands-down the most insane about this story to me is that those two events are deeply vivid in my mind in connection to this book, but neither of them actually happens here.
How is that possible?! My blood does that thing where it tries to get out of my skin just from thinking about that. I can picture Achilles's death so vividly, picture lying in that hammock and reading it after I graduated from college, but that never happened. Homer just planted the seeds of his death in my brain, and they grew from my constant pondering over them.
What causes violence? We say that something eternal, God or the gods, cause violence because they control our fate, they appear to us as birds and as wisdom and lead us on our night-blind path of life, but they lead us erratically: drunk, hysterical drivers and us with no seat belt, so we grasp for mere survival. Homer describes those motivations for violence so beautifully. But, ultimately I think that is all bullshit, and I think the bullshitness of it is there in this story, too. It is there in Achilles challenging Agamemnon. It is there in Achilles mourning Patroclus.
What a shame. Anyway, though, people are not violent because we were betrayed or because of supernatural trickery. Our violence is ours; it is our choice and our responsibility. Life is barbarous and cruel around us, but that is its nature, and we can only shape ourselves through and around it. When we expect life to be gentle and obedient, we are usually doing nothing more than justifying our own cruelty. It is blood-poundingly, eye-achingly told. As my professor said, everyone should read this, and if you can read it in the sun, lying in a hammock after your graduation, all the better. View all 18 comments. Jan 17, Riku Sayuj rated it it was amazing Shelves: translated , religion , epics , philosophy , myth-religion , favorites , r-r-rs , ww1 , spiritual , classics.
There might be some truth to this, a universal truth. Significantly however, this is not how the ancients understood it. They understood war as the catastrophe that it is. Precisely because of this the Blake exclamation might have been more valid than it had a right to be. This is why there is a need to revisit the original tragic purpose of the Epic - most commentators would say that as above this original purpose was against ALL wars. But there is much significance to the fact that the epic celebrates the doomed fight of two extinct peoples. The Iliad starts on the eve of war and ends on the eve of war. In that clash of the Titans, the epic defines itself and creates a lasting prophecy.
In Medias Res The Iliad opens in medias res , as it were, as if the epic-recitation was already on its way and we, the audience, have just joined. The art of Iliad is then the art of the entrance, the players enter from an ongoing world which is fully alive in the myths that surround the epic and the audience. The poem describes neither the origins nor the end of the war. After the initial skirmish with Agamemnon and the withdrawal that forms the curtain-raiser, Achilles plays no part in the events described in Books 2 through 8; he sits by his ships on the shore, playing his harp, having his fun, waiting for the promised end.
The scene where Hector meets Andromache and his infant son is one of the most poignant scenes of the epic and heightened by Homer for maximum dramatic tension. On the other hand, Achilles is almost non-human, close to a god. Zeus and the Gods know the future, they know how things are going to unfold. Among the mortals fighting it out in the plains of Ilium, only Achilles shares this knowledge, and this fore-knowledge is what allows him in the guise of rage to stay away from battle, even at the cost of eternal honor. Fore-knowledge is what makes Achilles who is the most impetuous man alive wiser than everyone else.
Hector on the other hand takes heed of no omens, or signs, nor consults any astrologer. He is the rational man. He is the ordinary man. Roused to defense. But everything Hector believes is false just as everything Achilles knows is true - for all his prowess, Hector is as ordinary a soldier as anyone else except Achilles , privy to no prophecies, blind to his own fate. That he can save Troy all by himself. But, it also charts the metamorphosis of Achilles from a man who abhors a war that holds no meaning for him to a man who fights for its own sake. On the other side, it also charts how the civilized Hector, the loving family man and dutiful patriot Hector becomes a savage, driven by the madness of war. Before that, an interlude. That is when Achilles delivers his famous anti-war speech.
This speech of Achilles can be seen as a repudiation of the heroic ideal itself, of kleos - a realization that the life and death dedicated to glory is a game not worth the candle. The reply is a long, passionate outburst; he pours out all the resentment stored up so long in his heart. He rejects out of hand this embassy and any other that may be sent; he wants to hear no more speeches. Not for Agamemnon nor for the Achaeans either will he fight again. He is going home, with all his men and ships. But though it might seem as preordained, it is useful to question it closely. The confrontation is crucial and deserves very close scrutiny. We must ask ourselves - What brings on this confrontation?
On first glance, it was fate, but if looked at again, we can see that Homer leaves plenty of room for free-will and human agency - Hector had a choice. But not Achilles - instead, Achilles' choice was exercised by Patroclus. This calls for a significant re-look at the central conflict of the epic: it might not be Hector Vs Achilles! Patroclus and Hector instead are the real centerpiece of the epic - Achilles being the irresistible force, that is once unleashed unstoppable. It is a no-contest. Hence, the real contest happens before. This is because, that unleashing depended entirely on Hector and Patroclus - the two heroes who only went into battle when their side was in dire straits - to defend. Both then got caught up in the rage of battle, and despite the best of advice from their closest advisors, got swept up by it and tried to convert defense into annihilation of enemy - pursuing kleos!
It is worth noting the significant parallels between Hector and Patroclus, while between Hector and Achilles it is the contrasts that stand forth. Hector, instead of just defending his city, surges forth and decides to burn the Achaean ships. Now, the Achaean ships symbolize the future of the Greek race. Homer implies that the mass death of these leaders and role models would have meant the decimation of a civilization. Which means that the Achaeans cant escape - in effect, Hector, by trying to burn the ships is in effect calling for a fight to the death! This decision was taken in the face of very strong omens and very good advice: In the battle at the trench and rampart in Book Twelve, The Trojans Storm the Rampart , Polydamas sees an eagle flying with a snake, which it drops because the snake keeps attacking it; Polydamas decides this is an omen that the Trojans will lose.
He tells Hector they must stop, but Hector lashes out that Zeus told him to charge; he accuses Polydamas of being a coward and warns him against trying to convince others to turn back or holding back himself. Hector is driven on by his success to overstep the bounds clearly marked out for him by Zeus. Thus, sadly, Hector pays no heed and surges forth. Which is the cue for the other patriot to enter the fray - for Patroclus.
Thus Patroclus too shows that knows no restraint in victory; his friends too warned him in vain, and he paid for it with his life. By this time Hector had no choice, his fate was already sealed. Achilles was about to be unleashed. Achilles, Unchained. In his soliloquy before the Scacan gate, when he expects to die by Achilles' hand, he also has his first moment of insight: he sees that he has been wrong, and significantly enough Polydamas and his warnings come back to his mind. But he decides to hold his ground for fear of ridicule, of all things!
So even as all the other Trojans ran inside the impregnable city walls to shelter, Hector waited outside torn between life and honor contrast this with Achilles who had chosen life over honor, the lyre over the spear, so effortlessly earlier. Hector instead waits until unnerved, until too late. And then the inevitable death comes. Thus the Rage was unleashed by two men who tried to do more than defend themselves - they tried to win eternal honor or kleos - the result is the unleashing of the fire called Achilles his rage which burns itself and everything around it to the ground. What better invocation of what war means? I ask again, what better book to read for the centenary year for The World War I? This is very poetic and poignant, but it is time for more questions: Again, why start and end on the eve of battle?
Because that is the only space for reflection that war allows. Before the madness of the fury of war or of disaster descends like a miasmic cloud. The two men who could have effected a reconciliation , who had a vision beyond war, are dead. Achilles' death is left to the audience to imagine, over and over again, in every context as required. Once Hector committed his folly, once Patroclus rushed to his death, and once Achilles is unleashed, the rest is fixed fate, there is no stopping it. So Homer begins and ends in truce, but with destruction round the corner - as if the cycle was meant to be repeated again and again, stretching backwards and forwards in time - Troy I, Troy II, … to Troy VI, Troy VII, … where does it end?
The epic leaves us with the real doomsday just over the horizon, horribly presaged by it, in true prophetic fashion. In another ancient epic, Gilgamesh , the death of a friend prompts a quest which ends in wisdom and an affirmation of life; in The Iliad, the death of the fabled friend leads to a renunciation of wisdom and a quest for death itself! In Gilgamesh, the hero learns the follies of life and rebuilds civilization; in The Iliad, Achilles comes into the epic already armed with this knowledge and moves towards seeking death, choosing to be the destroyer instead of the creator.
The Iliad is an epic of unlearning. It mocks optimistic pretensions. In The Iliad, the participants learn nothing from their ordeal, all the learning is left to the audience. View all 48 comments. Jun 06, Ines rated it it was amazing Shelves: favorites , latin-and-greek-classics. This is a must read for every italian boys and girls at school many years ago the ministry of education put it with Dante, and Manzoni as a fixed programm to study for all the young italians ; we begin to study "Iliade" from middle then up to High school The programm was so difficult that an american teacher's we met during an exchange programm, told us that what we were doing was used to be studied during the 3th year of College for classic studies in the US.
Now at 43 years old, i can only say , how lucky i have been to met such persons, teachers that loved their studies and their jobs!! May 05, Alison rated it it was amazing. But now I know that the best way to keep insomnia at bay is to get out of bed, hitch up my chariot, tie the corpse of my mortal enemy to the back, and drive around for a few hours, dragging him, until I cheer up and can go back to sleep. The Iliad is unmatched, in my reading, for works that describe the bloody, ridiculous, selfish lengths people will go in order to feel better.
The Iliad suggests that even at its most glorious, war can be advocated only by people with the emotional lives of spoiled four-year-olds View all 21 comments. Jul 09, Lisa rated it it was amazing. Do you really LIKE to read line after line of gory murder, repeated endlessly from song to song? I evaded the question, speaking of fantastic opening lines, of classic art and immense influence on other authors. And then I capitulated - a little: "The Odyssey is much more interesting as a story! As a reader, you will want to tackle them at some point, and the rules you apply to more recent works of fiction don't count. You award yourself 5 stars for finishing, for knowing more than you did before starting.
But then my son killed the Iliad with a spear as sharp as those of Homeric warriors. He compared it to Greek tragedy. They are thought-provoking, exciting, and classic. Troy's fall from the perspective of Philoctetes is pure literary bliss. The Iliad is not. But it remains Read as part of my degree and as part of my love of classics, however it didn't compare to The Odyssey which I adored - possibly due to the lack of mythological creatures and rather more battles and lists of ships and names, which made it that much harder to struggle through. Still a great read as one of the original classics but I would choose The Odyssey over the Iliad anytime. View all 6 comments.
Feb 25, Loretta rated it it was ok Shelves: classic , myreading-challenge. This was a terribly hard read for me. I struggled to finish it, but finish it I did. View all 31 comments. Sep 23, Adina marked it as abandoned Shelves: , classics , in-biblioteca , greece , the-literature-book-pres. Last year I attended a conference where one of the speakers stated that literature starts with Homer. I love to read so I thought that maybe I should see what the fuss is about with the cradle of the written word. I do not like poetry but I said that maybe it is time to learn how to appreciate it.
Well, it didn't go well. I appreciate its worth but It was a chore to read and I had to stop after pages or so. No more epic poems for me. View all 4 comments. After reading The Illiad I faced a quandary- how do you review one of the most important and enduring works of creativity in human history? What can you say that hundreds of thousands of others haven't? My answer to this question is that I must join the chorus of those who have come before me and sing the praises of what is one of the best stories I have ever read, as fascinating and gripping now as it no doubt was when it was penned nearly three millennia ago. There are many reasons why this book After reading The Illiad I faced a quandary- how do you review one of the most important and enduring works of creativity in human history?
There are many reasons why this book has endured. It is a story of love, hate, vengeance, fate, pettiness, grief and war, bloody and prolonged war - a microcosm of human life and the furies that drive us to excess. You know the story. Paris steals Helen away to Troy. Agamemnon and the Greeks raise and army and lay seige to that great city. Achilles, the greatest warrior history has ever seen, fights and dies, a poison arrow embedded in his ankle. The Greeks roll a massive wooden horse up to Troy's gates, and the war ends in trickery and massacre.
You know all this, but trust me, you don't know it the way The Illiad tells it. This is a glorious read, the brutal blows and shrieks of war leap from the page, and the human passions that drive the protaganists are vivid and compelling. You will read this book and wonder at how something from another time, translated from it's original tongue, can so totally enthrall a modern reader. It's powerful, heady stuff. So many images from this story are carved into my synapses. Hector and Achilles stalking the battlefield like avatars of death, scything down opponents in their tens.
Priam begging Achilles for the return of his son's mangled body. Heroes cut down mid-fight, their souls headed for the underworld, their deaths mourned even by the gods on Olympus, who watch and guide the battle from above. There are a handful of books that every reader must experience - books that are milestones in human culture. The Illiad is one of these books. I don't know how I lived more than three decades before I read it, and it makes me nostalgic for a time I never lived through, when a high school education in the classics was something that everyone received. View all 15 comments. The original Marvel movie? What struck me most about The Iliad on this first read is that it has so much more in common with whichever blockbuster is showing at your nearest multiplex, than it does with novels as we know them today.
Even the tedious parts make more sense when you view the whole thing as a movie told in words. Homer is very partial to extended similes involving lions, dogs and wild boar for some reason: As when in the midst of dogs and hunting men a wild boar or lion wheels about, reveling in his strength, and the men arraying themselves like a wall of defense stand to face him and hurl from their hands volleys of spears; but never does his noble heart feel fear, nor does he flee—and his courage will kill him— and relentlessly he wheels about testing the ranks of men, and wherever he charges, there the ranks of men give way; so Hector going along the battle throng turned and twisted All this talk of lions and boars is a little clunky on the page, and it breaks up the flow of the story.
That we humans have relied on the same methods to tell a gripping story for over 3, years is a joy to me. Our direct connection through story to the past, to people of antiquity, The Iliad and other works like it serves as a reminder that those people were more like us than we tend to recognise. Not to mention it is just a bloody good yarn. View all 13 comments. The Iliad is an ancient Greek epic poem by Homer, which presents his interpretation of the events that took place during a few weeks of the tenth and final year of the Trojan War.
Homer's tale of the Trojan War runs from the time of Achilles's falling out with the Greek King, Lord Agamemnon, and shunning from the war to the time when he re-enters it and kills the Trojan hero, Hector, to avenge the death of his friend and companion, Patroclus. After my reading of The Odyssey , I felt I need to re The Iliad is an ancient Greek epic poem by Homer, which presents his interpretation of the events that took place during a few weeks of the tenth and final year of the Trojan War.
The thought that I might not have fully appreciated it kept on nagging me. I first read a prose version, but this time I resorted to the poetic translation done by Alexander Pope. And I have to confess that the result was surprising. Not only I understood it well, but I also came to fully appreciate the extent of Homer's artistry. In this new light, I'm obliged to amend my former review to express my truest thoughts on this amazing classic. In my first read, I've misunderstood the role of Gods.
I thought that they dictated and interfered unjustly in the men's war and hindered their valor. But after my reread, I now understand it was fate that governed it all, and that the Gods' role was to facilitate the course of fate. Of course, the Gods supported their chosen camp, some siding with the Greeks, who they believed to have been injured by the treachery of Paris of Troy, and others siding with the Trojans, for their faithful reverence of mighty Olympian Gods. But not any of them, not even the all-powerful Zeus could alter what the fate decreed on the mortal men. When I understood fully the role of God, men, and fate, I was able to view the whole thing through new eyes and appreciate and enjoy the tale for its true worth.
The Iliad is a tragedy. The main themes of this tragic tale are honour, loyalty, glory, and revenge. It was not the pleasantest read. Too much importance is given to the descriptions of gruesome details of war. The dramatic quality with which Homer has knitted his poem made so vivid a portrayal of battle scenes and horrific deaths that I found many passages hard to stomach. At the same time, I couldn't help admiring the ability of Homer to draw such realistic pictures through his finesse writing. And even more, I could sense the fury of men of both camps as they lunged at each other with their weapons drawn; I could hear their war cries.
I could also hear the sound of the wheels of the chariots taking the warriors to the battle, the clanging of the weapons, and the groans and moans of the dead. It was truly more than a reading experience. The narrator of the tale, while taking us through the present events, also fills in the gaps of the past and makes predictions for the future. This method of recounting the story gives a complete picture of the tale, although in the strictest sense the poem only describes a few weeks of the final year of the Trojan War.To learn more about text construction, have a read of What Is Metalanguage? This will be discussed in detail under Blending Quotes. These The Importance Of Telemachus Speech In The Odyssey the poet's coming to terms with a sense of artistic failure, and jealousies and hatreds that must be faced and The Importance Of Telemachus Speech In The Odyssey. Although there are a few ways in which to structure The Importance Of Telemachus Speech In The Odyssey comparative essay, with The Importance Of Telemachus Speech In The Odyssey Case Study Of Mangos Restaurant opting for whichever approach The Importance Of Telemachus Speech In The Odyssey best for them, I will focus upon two different methods, which I find to The Importance Of Telemachus Speech In The Odyssey the easiest and most concise. The introduction is really good, too. Listening sample paper 2. Eventually, in a pivotal monologue, Margo discusses the problems that have been plaguing her.