① World War 3 Illuminati
World war 3 illuminati has the capacity to house world war 3 illuminati, people Freedmens Bureau Case Analysis up to 10 years. But, one can think that this version where contagion is possible, but kept in the world war 3 illuminati, will be only the first step. You should world war 3 illuminati consider getting an oil diffuser for your bedside table world war 3 illuminati you can drift off to sleep with scents of lavender oil in the bedroom. They are harmless to the elite. World war 3 illuminati an exhaustive analysis, we could notice that important buildings that have a proven link with world war 3 illuminati secret societies of Masonic sects are located exactly on the 33rd parallel, as well as historical events of historical relevance occurred when did christopher columbus died these coordinates, such as world war 3 illuminati murder of J. The woman in question is in fact known.
World War 3 - Official Smolensk Map Showcase
Obviously, the 3 world wars have been planned for many generations. At the end of the war, Communism will be built and used to destroy the other governments and in order to weaken the religions. This was must be brought about so that Nazism is destroyed and that the political Zionism be strong enough to institute a sovereign state of Israel in Palestine. During the Second World War, International Communism must become strong enough to balance Christiandom, which would then be restrained and held in check until the time when we would need it for the final social cataclysm. On the other side of the world, in the aftermath of the war with Japan, they allowed Communism to sweep into China. The answer is simple: Truman, Churchill, and Stalin were all Freemasons. Before Truman, we had Franklin D.
Roosevelt… another Freemasons working for the order. Those that believe Nazism and Zionism were not known in because none of that appears in history books or was taught in school will find, with a little research, that The Illuminati created both of these movements. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam and Zionism mutually destroy each other. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time. No one has the right to force beliefs of any kind on another person. No one has the authority to force us to believe anything. Is it all starting to make sense?
This only scratches the surface. People need to pass this on. This is important information. These subjects are so suppressed that so few people believe this stuff. Society needs to know the truth on a massive scale. In , Jewish broadcaster, Myron C. Fagan described with documentary evidence how the Illuminati became the instrument of the House of Rothschild to achieve a one world government, and how every war in the past two centuries has been orchestrated by them. He revealed how Jacob H. Schiff seduced our congress and our presidents to achieve control of our entire money system and create the income tax system. Him and his co-conspirators created the Council on Foreign Relations to control our elected officials to gradually drive the U.
You are commenting using your WordPress. You are commenting using your Google account. You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email. Skip to content. At its base, the Goddess Athena sits, looking downward into hell. Share this: Twitter Facebook. Like this: Like Loading Published June 11, June 21, It is a fact that the elderly accounted for the largest number of deaths in covid So, question: "Did the elderly die more than in a normal year? But, on the face of it, I don't think so. In my opinion, there was an over-mortality of old people because of the hysteria instilled in the medical profession. Besides, this is not something that should put off the elite.
They kill tens of millions of people every year with the cancer scam, the diabetes scam, the hypertension scam, the treatment of various microbial diseases, etc. So if they don't have any qualms about doing it, adding a few million more around the world must not have been a problem. Of course, I could be wrong. But whether or not this is true is not the main point of this analysis. What is important is that at least a part of the people believes it.
Again, this is related to the third world war. Indeed, it seems clear to me that the goal here is to give an additional reason to the anti-illuminati to oppose the power in place. This can be seen from the reactions of the elite-controlled anti-illuminati sites. A few have suggested that covid19 has led to the slaughter of the elderly. It hasn't been the most prominent thing. But it was brought up. This is what happened, for example, on the Bouddhanar site, a French anti-illuminati site set up by the elite. We have for example the following article from April 12, Charbonier denounces the active euthanasia of the elderly. Who will stop the Talmudic-Masonic sect in power that does not shrink from crimes against humanity? Or this one , from September 1, Indeed, there has been, especially in France, a crime against humanity: the active euthanasia of the elderly.
Or this one , from January 1, There will be a mutation. And this one , from January 31, By allowing and encouraging the prescription of Rivotril for elderly and dependent people, the government seems to have chosen the option of unspoken euthanasia, under the guise of accompaniment in the end of life, and of pain management. And apparently the well-publicized documentary " hold-up " says so too. This is what we learn on this anti-conspiracy site :. Apparently, in Anglo-Saxon countries, the subject has been little discussed. The Swedish case and the French case would have been talked about a bit on some English websites.
But, apart from that, it doesn't seem that the issue has been treated so much on the conspirationist sites Henry Makow talks about it in this article. So, for the moment, this element of opposition will probably develop mainly in France. But one can think that in the future it will spread to other countries. Now, one could say that as epidemics do not occur very often, the usefulness of massacring a part of the elderly via the covid19 scam is rather limited. It's a bit of a one-shot gun. It will be a thing of the past. Indeed, we have seen for a little over 10 years that the elite is pushing the concept of euthanasia very strongly.
They are pushing through laws on this subject at full speed. And they are using all their propaganda to make it look progressive and to make it look like everybody wants to be euthanized and that at the moment, most people who are about to die are undergoing therapeutic harassment and have to struggle to get doctors to agree to pull the plug. And this is not limited to a few countries. Laws allowing euthanasia have been passed in most Western countries. By , almost all of Western Europe accepts passive euthanasia see Wikipedia. The reason for the euthanasia project is once again the third world war. Because, in the same way as with covid19, it will allow the oppositions between conspirationists and ordinary people to be stirred up.
Indeed, even at fairly low levels of conspirationism, it looks very much like a dystopian and even a Satanist project. Of course, for ordinary people, it seems like progress, because it avoids the supposedly therapeutic harassment. But, for people who are a little more advanced, it is quite clear that it will mainly allow the extermination of old people.
And if that's not obvious enough for them, the conspirationist sites run by the elite will "enlighten" them. In fact, the subject has been discussed by elite-controlled anti-illuminati sites and agents of influence for a long time. For example, in , the agent of influence Alain Soral spoke about it in France here , on radio Ici et Maintenant, March 29, It is the infanticide and the elimination of the elderlies. And unfortunately, it is a liberal fatality.
So, we are in the process of passing off a heroic fight for the right to die with dignity as in reality an extension of the liberal logic which is basically to reduce children to the logic of the commodity "I want it, I don't want it". And to manage old people as we manage goods, well That is to say, old people are expensive and don't bring in anything. There are more and more of them. Kids need the money. They live too long. The ideology of the seniors makes them spend all the money in the last 5 years. So, if I want to be a little provocative, I would say right now, they are preparing, they are setting up the ideology of eliminating the old. So, as early as , agents of influence began to "denounce" the euthanasia project saying that the goal was to exterminate the old people.
There were:. So, for now, the anti-illuminati sites are only talking about this topic fairly episodically. And the euthanasia project is still relatively light. But, we can be sure that it will grow in strength over the years, and that the opposition to the project will do the same. So, the purpose of the euthanasia project is not to slaughter old people per se; it is to give an additional motivation to the anti-illuminati to fight against the power in place. From there, we can think of the following. Maybe the slaughter of the elderly is very secondary in the covid19 project, maybe not. It all depends on whether it is part of a larger project of inventing diseases that largely target the elderly.
If other epidemics are invented by the elite in the next 25 or 30 years, with the objective of massacring the old, and if eventually these diseases are not transient no vaccine or drug , then this project will have almost as much importance as the euthanasia project regarding the elimination of the old and the denunciation of this project by anti-illuminati. And it will mean in retrospect that the killing of the elderly was important in the covid19 project. Even if these diseases are only temporary because they are "cured" by a vaccine or a drug, it will still be of interest to the elite.
Indeed, epidemics will allow to have a peak of killings of old people and euthanasia will allow to have a permanent project. And of course, the fact that there are new liberticidal laws like the ones we had with covid19 will participate in this. And it would be surprising that the massacre of the elderly was mentioned for covid19 if it was not destined to be followed by other diseases targeting the elderly. If euthanasia was the important project in relation to the elimination of the elderly and covid19 was just a one-off, the elite-controlled conspirationist sites would not have mentioned this issue in the last few months.
If they did, it is probable that in won't be an isolated affair. The main explanation that will be given to the conspirationists at the beginning is the fact that for the elite, an old person is a useless person, a financial burden. And with the aging of the population, there are more and more of them. So, the elite would seek to kill the elderly to pay for their retirement for as little time as possible and to reduce end-of-life care expenses. The problem is that the elite can achieve the same result by forcing people to work longer and reducing the amount of their retirement.
And then they can easily erode pensions through inflation and other indirect means. Finally, if it had been a financial problem, the elite simply would not have created a pension system in the first place, 60 or 70 years ago, or else a much less advantageous system. Moreover, what must be considered, regarding euthanasia, is that in reality, it has already been practiced on a large scale for at least years in hospitals.
Indeed, if the doctors consider that the patient is terminally ill, they kill him with the following triptych: massive administration of opiates, stop of feeding, stop of hydration. And medicine is already reducing life expectancy through false diagnoses and harmful treatments. So the elite don't really need to formalize it to practice it. By making it official, it will kill people a little earlier, but not much earlier: maybe a year, two at the most. If a person has cancer, two years before death, he or she is usually still well enough not to ask for euthanasia. A priori, the interest of making euthanasia legal is limited to shortening life expectancy. Therefore, the real goal is not to shorten the life of the elderly. If it were, the elite would seek to reduce it much more.
The other explanation offered for euthanasia in conspirationist circles will be that the elite are Satanists and want to create a kind of hell on earth. But this will be reserved for the more advanced conspirationists at first. Then it will filter down to a more moderate part of the conspirationists, so that the union with the Muslims can take place. A reflection that one can make is that, in fact, it is rather the epidemic, or more generally the disease that is interesting to shorten the life of the elderly in a relatively important way, not really euthanasia, since the latter only allows to shorten life by 1 or 2 years on average.
Whereas you can very well have bogus diseases that supposedly affect mainly the elderly and shorten their life expectancy by 4 or 5 years or even more, this without official euthanasia but with unofficial euthanasia. Of course, it is even better with both together. But it can very well be done with diseases only. There is one reason why the elite should use only diseases, and that is discretion. Normally, the elite should want to shorten people's lives discreetly, so that the people don't object because here we are talking about a massacre that concerns everyone in the long run.
Now, as much as with euthanasia, the will to eliminate old people is quite easy to see especially in the current context of the rise of conspirationism , as much as with diseases, it can go very unnoticed, even in this context. So, logically, they should only have recourse to inventions of diseases, and not at all to euthanasia. But this is not what they do. They emphasize euthanasia as well as diseases. And currently, they are even emphasizing euthanasia more than diseases covid19 being an isolated case for the moment.
So they obviously want their goal of slaughtering old people to be seen. Then, either it's because they feel so powerful that they are not afraid of people noticing. But even then, it's quite dangerous, because it concerns everyone. Or it is because the real goal is that some people here, the anti-illuminati realize that this is a will to massacre the aged and oppose the project. And even for the only disease aimed mainly at the elderly that it has so far launched covid19 , the elite has ensured that its desire to eliminate them is seen in certain countries especially in France, apparently.
Indeed, in France, it was the Ritrovil affair a drug of the benzodiazepine class that sparked things off, with decree of March 28, In short, the government temporarily authorized Ritrovil to be used in EHPADs for the sedation of elderly people at the end of life, whereas normally it could only be used in hospitals. Of course, this facilitated the elimination of the elderly via lethal sedation, since they did not need to be transported to hospitals to do so. And immediately, the conspirationist sites under control talked about it and denounced a will to euthanize the old. And the mainstream sites responded to the conspirationists, thus informing the non-conspirationist masses of the controversy. But the elite could have killed the elderly en masse without this decree.
So, the purpose of the decree was really to make the elite's desire to kill the old visible, and to provoke a reaction. Anyway, even without Ritrovil, this desire to kill old people was put forward by several conspirationist sites which are under control. Indeed, since many have taken up the theories that there is no covid19 virus and therefore no epidemic, the logical conclusion was necessarily that it was a conspiracy and that one of the goals was the elimination of a part of the old people. So, since these sites are under the control of the elite, it means once again, that the elite wanted people to be aware of this will to eliminate the old people. In short, if the elite is not trying to eliminate the elderly in a hidden way, although it could very well do so, it shows that its objective is to make a part of the people aware of it, and then to oppose it.
Another detail, euthanasia will be presented as an idea brought by the Jews and the Freemasons. That's why in France, the Jew Jacques Attali, the eminence grise of the left, presented the idea of euthanasia as something normal and even desirable since it was presented as a fundamental freedom , at the beginning of the 80s. This can be read in his book "The Future of Life", published in , pages In a socialist logic, to begin with, the problem is posed as follows: socialist logic is freedom and the fundamental freedom is suicide : consequently, the right to direct or indirect suicide is an absolute value in this type of society. In a capitalist society, killing machines, prostheses which will allow to eliminate life when it will be too unbearable, or economically too expensive, will be created and will be common practice.
I therefore believe that euthanasia, whether it is a value of freedom or a commodity, will be one of the rules of future society. So when the anti-illuminati win, things will go badly for the Jews also because of this. This will be one of the many grievances against the Jews that will apparently make it logical for them to be persecuted and then expelled to Israel. Last detail, euthanasia has to involve many countries for it to give the impression to the anti-illuminatis that it is part of the conspiracy.
If euthanasia only involved two or three countries, it would not be consistent with the idea of a world conspiracy. On the other hand, Muslim countries will not normally adopt this measure. It will make it look like the elite is not in control of the whole world and that there is a real opposition between the West and the Muslim world. When in reality, all sides are controlled by the same elite. Another interesting element of the case is that some of the elite-controlled anti-illuminati sites have started to say that no virus exists.
Moreover, new personalities suddenly appeared and quickly became stars of the virus questioning, such as Andrew Kaufman and Thomas Cowan a psychiatrist and a general practitioner. And their sudden appearance clearly indicates that they are agents of influence. But moreover, when you look at their curriculum vitae, it is even clearer I will analyze their biographies in the next chapter. Finally, the fact that they are mentioned on elite-controlled conspirationist sites makes it completely obvious.
So the question here is why is the elite doing this? It's odd that they would take the questioning of medicine to the viruses themselves. Until now, conspirationist sites have been content with a fairly light critique, mostly on vaccines and some other affairs of superficial importance provided by the elite. Now, they are taking it to a whole new level. The problem is that indeed, viruses do not exist. So, it is not in the interest of the elite to reveal this secret. The reasons for this are not yet completely clear to me. But I can think of five. So, it's probably not so embarrassing for the elite to reveal the truth. It will be washed away with the defeat of the anti-illuminati camp. This is the case with other revelations that are currently being made by the elite-controlled anti-illuminati sites.
Regarding the second reason , Kaufman and Cowan have given a number of details about the virus isolation procedure. It's not just a few bits of information. So if the elite are giving details, it suggests that they really want to challenge the viruses. If that's the case, we can think of another possible strategy for the elite. Perhaps before or during World War III, they will try to make it look like they have been eliminated. Indeed, now many people are aware that the elite exists and know its scams at least some of them. And there is a risk that this awareness will not disappear after the 3rd world war. So, as long as people believe that an elite is ruling us, the idea may spread again and threaten its existence.
To avoid this, the ideal is to make people believe that the elite has been destroyed. It is the same principle as in the film "My name is Nobody", where Jack Beauregard Henry Fonda pretends to be dead by means of a fake duel with "Nobody" Terence Hill , which allows him to retire quietly in Europe. So, the elite might decide to abandon several major scams to better convince the awake people that they have been defeated. It will seem so incredible to the people in question that the elite could agree to abandon these scams that they will think that the only possible explanation is that the elite have indeed been destroyed. On the other hand third reason , Kaufman and Cowan have also come out with some crazy stuff about 5G.
This suggests that the goal is to torpedo the questioning of viruses by making them look like a bunch of lunatics to ordinary people. A fourth possible reason is that the elite may only be putting Kaufman and Cowan forward temporarily, for one or two years. Thus, these ideas will be quickly forgotten by ordinary conspirationists once the conspirationist sites stop advertising them. In this case, there would be no desire to change things about viruses. The only interest would eventually be to monopolize the search results on Google to steer the conspirationists into a dead end. I also see a fifth possible reason. It could be that Cowan and Kaufman actually only the latter serve to keep the virus theory alive in the dissident world, but without the name virus.
Apparently, Kaufman considers that viruses do not exist which is also my position. He says that what are believed to be viruses are in fact exosomes , that is, particles emitted by cells and capable of transmitting information between cells I think that this is false and that they are only cellular debris which do not transmit any information. Now, it is true that he explains contagious diseases apparently mainly by external physical or chemical causes. And if a person's body is not ready to process the information provided by the exosomes, it is possible that it will cause disease at 31 min.
So, in a way, exosomes can be a cause of disease, and a contagious cause. Cowan seems to acknowledge the existence of viruses, but says that it is the immune system's reaction that causes the symptoms of the disease, not the virus itself here , at In other words, it is the healing process initiated by the body that causes the symptoms. Symptoms that are not dangerous but on the contrary allow to heal. It is the fact of interrupting the process by taking medication that is dangerous. So, apparently, it is only Kaufman who questions the viruses in the tandem. Thus, he is the one who is interesting to analyze here. In fact, exosomes are not an invention or discovery made by Kaufman.
They are particles discovered actually invented by official medicine around So, he is just repeating this concept. And official medicine also says that these particles carry information between cells. The problem here is that the idea of information-carrying particles can be the same thing as the viral theory. If the information carried by the exosomes results in a reaction of the body that is similar to this or that disease, then we are in a concept that resembles the viral theory nanometric particles that carry information that makes you sick.
Then, you just have to say that the information of the exosomes is transmissible from a sick individual to a healthy individual, and can make the latter sick; and there you have it, you have recreated the viral theory. Now, in this interview , Kaufman says at 28 minutes that the difference between viruses and exosomes is that the latter are not there to make you sick, but to cure you. But as noted above, he also says 31 min that if the body is not ready to process the information, the person can develop the symptoms of the disease. So, potentially, this is very similar to the concept of the pathogenic virus, even though the causes of the symptoms are different.
I had thought before I read more about what Kaufman says that he would probably limit himself at first to a theory where exosomes only transmit information internally, and that he would only introduce the idea of contagion in a few years. Indeed, the problem is that if someone introduces the idea of transmission between persons out of the blue, it is too easy to see that he is trying to reintroduce the concept of virus under another name.
But in fact, no. The elite did not take this precaution. Kaufman immediately incorporates the possibility of transmission from one individual to another and the possibility that it will make the "infected" person sick. So, the elite immediately reintegrated the idea of possible contagion between people; but, for now, it remains in the background. Kaufman apparently talks mostly about chemical causes vaccines and DDT concerning polio for example , physical or electromagnetic causes 5G. By the way, apart from the electromagnetic causes, his explanations concerning certain contagious diseases do not seem to be very fresh.
Medical dissenters have long been accusing vaccines and DDT of being the real causes of polio. But, one can think that this version where contagion is possible, but kept in the background, will be only the first step. The elite will most likely bring it back to the forefront and thus get a viral concept but without the name virus. It is possible that after Cowan and Kaufman, others will take up this theory, but water it down. They will present themselves as the men of the middle ground, against the viral theory, but also against the initial exosome theory, considered too restrictive and primitive.
It will then replace the first version of the theory, which put contagion in the background. And we'll have a lot of influencers going on the Internet to present it as a great theory. The dissenters will then have almost completely joined the official theory with just two or three variations and it will take another 30 years for a new dissidence to emerge on this subject. The elite have done this before for other dissident movements in medicine.
For example, in the s, fake cancer dissidents said that it was cancer treatments that were killing people which is correct, even if incomplete and that you should not take them, but that you should instead consume large amounts of vitamin C. Of course, they were presented by the media as dangerous sectarian movements, led by lunatics. Then, towards the end of the 90's, the dissidents in question, or their successors, put some water in their wine and started to say that you should not reject modern medicine, and thus that you should take chemotherapy, rays, etc.
And so all the really dissenting side disappeared. All that was left was the official theory, with a sprinkling of vitamin C for the alternative medicine supporters. In the end, nothing has changed on the essential point that it is the treatments that kill and we have lost 20 years because of this false dissent. So here there is a battle between the idea that cells just release inert particles and the idea that they emit particles that transmit information between cells. It seems like a small difference, but it changes everything. With the first idea which I defend , the emitted particles cannot cause anything. There can be no contagion. Only physical or chemical causes can lead to diseases.
And we have to look for these causes. And normally, there is no reason to get sick if you don't expose yourself to chemical or physical aggressions. With the second one defended by Kaufman , it can be said that the information conveyed by these particles can make you sick or at least cause symptoms similar to the disease. And you can say that these particles can be transmitted between individuals and make them sick, just like viruses. Therefore, you can get sick even if you are not exposed to any chemical or physical aggression. Behind this small difference, there is a huge issue. Namely: simply the maintenance of the viral theory under another name or its definitive elimination.
At this point, one question arises: why do this? If no one questions the viruses, there is no point. It would be trying to fix something that isn't broken. And before Kaufman and Cowan came along, very few people were doing that. There was Stefan Lanka and me and regarding me, the elite obviously organize the most total silence. And eventually Alain Scohy in France , but you don't get the impression that he was producing much and besides, he's certainly an agent of influence. You can't say that it was a threat to the elite. Now, it's true that, on the forums, there have been a few people questioning them over the last 4 or 5 years.
So maybe the medical orthodoxy saw the danger and wanted to control the movement with agents of influence. But these criticisms on the forums remain very limited and very little developed. They are harmless to the elite. Moreover, since the latter is planning for the very long term, they must have been planning for a long time to question the virus. So, in principle, it did not happen in reaction to the awareness of a few individuals. In my opinion, the reason must have been to present one more dissident theory during the current period. Indeed, the elite is making sure to propagate various conspiracy theories to the waking public so that anti-illuminati conspirationism gains momentum. There has been, for example, the questioning of lunar expeditions, the revisionism of the Shoah, the dissent on vaccines, the anti-illuminati conspiracy itself, etc… The questioning of viruses is the latest avatar of this project.
The elite wanted to present one more conspiracy theory or at least a dissident one. But of course they didn't want it to really enlighten people. So, they presented a theory that they could move in the future towards positions close to medical orthodoxy, thus annihilating all its revolutionary content. From this point on, there are two possibilities. Either this operation is aimed at the most advanced conspirationists those who have already begun to doubt virology or who may do so in the coming years , or it is aimed at the general public. In the first case, it would prevent these conspirationists from going any further in their questioning, by pointing them in the wrong direction.
And the elite will make sure that this theory does not leave the conspirationist circle. If it is aimed at the general public, it means that the elite will abandon the viral theory for the exosome theory version 2. This would be quite similar to the strategy presented above where the elite would sacrifice current virology to make it look like they the elite have disappeared. Except that in this variant, nothing will have changed, since the exosome theory will have become more or less the viral theory with another name.
But, at that point, people will not think that it is in fact the viral theory presented differently. Brainwashed by the agents of influence, they will think it is brilliant and completely miss the point. So, for now, it is difficult to determine where the elite want to go with the focus on the virus questioning movement. But, being aware that the elite is behind it will allow us sooner or later to understand what its goal is. First, both have Jewish names Cowan is an adaptation of Cohen, and for Kaufman, I think that speaks for itself. And Kaufman has a Jewish face.
That alone points to a scam right off the bat. The elite sent clearly Jewish agents because it must have amused them to see ordinary conspirationists, already very aware of the Jewish problem, either refusing to identify them as Jews, or doing intellectual contortions to justify the idea that these two are good Jews, not like the others, etc To repeat what I said above, the fact that they immediately received massive and enthusiastic publicity on many conspirationist sites run by the elite anti-illuminati and anti-Jewish tendencies clearly demonstrates that they are agents. Nobody gets such quick success on these sites if he is not one. Regarding Andrew Kaufman, he very quickly became associated with David Icke, a clear-cut agent of influence.
The problem here is not that Kaufman partnered with David Icke, but that Icke partnered with Kaufman. Why would an agent of influence support the claims of an honest guy telling the truth? But if the guy in question is also an agent, then it's clearer. And what's ultra suspicious is that he figured out the virology scam very recently and we don't have any articles or videos of him before. I did a search on him by typing Andrew Kaufman virus, or "Andrew Kaufman" virus, selecting results from before December analyzing the first 7 pages of results. And there are none. It may look like there are 2 or 3. But in fact, each time, the page links to another one from So, this simple psychiatrist appeared with a perfectly mastered theory all of a sudden.
He came out of nowhere. This kind of spontaneous generation is a little too good to be true.But, with this way of world war 3 illuminati things, the rejection rate will remain hidden St. Iraneaus: Gnostic Analysis the people and it will be more difficult world war 3 illuminati them to oppose this policy. We wish for these experiences world war 3 illuminati just happen once more as if that would ever The Importance Of Hang Nails world war 3 illuminati. No one has the authority to force us to believe anything. Last detail, world war 3 illuminati has to involve many countries world war 3 illuminati Essay On Symbolism In Invisible Man to give August Wilson Biography Essay impression world war 3 illuminati the anti-illuminatis that it is part of the conspiracy. And the epidemic is obviously completely bogus. If the information carried by the exosomes results in world war 3 illuminati reaction of the body that is similar world war 3 illuminati Persuasive Essay On Gay Sex Adoption or that disease, then we are in a concept that resembles the world war 3 illuminati theory nanometric world war 3 illuminati that carry information that makes you sick. It is a fact that the elderly accounted for the largest number of deaths in covid